KEEP LEARNING
  •  
  • SEARCH TOPICS

    Advanced Search

Improvements to All U.S. Federal Censuses

By Jana Lloyd 01 July 2009

 

Last month, if you were searching the 1810 U.S. census, you might have seen this: 



Now, you will see this:


 


In November, we sent a survey to our members, asking what record collections and improvements you would most like to see. Your number one request was for more improved U.S. federal census images and indexes—like those added for the 1900 census last year.


As a result, we made it our top priority for 2009 to continue improving U.S. Federal Censuses. We released enhanced images for the 1880 U.S. census in March, what is left of the 1890 census in May (most of the original census was destroyed in a fire), and this month we’ve released improved images for the 1810 U.S. census.  
 

We’ve also dedicated more memory to the census collection on our servers, so we can store them at a higher resolution. This means the images are even clearer, and you can zoom in for a closer look than ever before.


You’ll notice all of the images have a cleaner, crisper look. And occasionally you’ll find you can read names that were illegible before—either because they were too light, too dark, too blurry, covered in tape, or even in some cases missing, etc.


So if you found a record before that you couldn’t quite decipher (“Is that really my ancestor’s name? What is his occupation? I can’t quite make it out. . . .”) you’ll want to look again. The images will be updated on your family trees as well, so if you saved the record there, you can just revisit it on your tree.


Improved Indexes
As part of our census improvement project, we’ll also be releasing improved indexes to seven of our U.S. federal censuses—the 1850, 1860, 1870, 1900, 1910, 1920, and 1930 censuses (the 1900 improvements are already live).


We are adding new, “alternate” names in many places where it is difficult to decipher a name. So, if it is unclear whether a name is “Homer” or “Hamen” (see example below), you’ll be able to find the record by searching either name because we’ll have both versions available in the index. One of the names will show up as the “standard” name and the other as an alternate.


 
 
On this 1900 U.S. census record, it’s a little difficult to tell if this name is “Rebecca Hamen” or “Rebecca Homer.” Now, you can find the record when you search for either name.     



 
In your search results, alternate names show up below the original transcription, with a small yellow triangle next to them. 


For the 1900 U.S. census, we added 17.5 million alternate surnames, covering about 23% of the total names in the collection. We anticipate adding similar numbers of alternate names for the other six censuses for which we will be merging indexes.


Schedule for Improved Censuses 
New images for the 1810, 1880, 1890 (those few fragments available), and 1900 censuses are already on the site (the updated 1810 census is new this month). An updated index to the 1900 census is also already live.


Improved images for the 1820 census are scheduled to come out later this month, with the improved 1830 images following in August and the 1840 images in September. Improved images for the 1790 and 1800 censuses are scheduled to be released in the fall, and improved images and indexes for the 1850, 1860, and 1870 censuses are scheduled for the fall and winter.


Improvements for the 1910, 1920, and 1930 censuses will follow.


We’ll let you know as the updated images and indexes become available so you can search again for any ancestors you haven’t been able to find before.

 
 
Image from the former 1810 U.S. census collection. 


 
Image from the new, improved 1810 U.S. census collection. 



Image from the former 1810 U.S. census collection.
 


Image from the new, enhanced 1810 U.S. census collection.


 

Image from the former 1810 U.S. census. Some of the names are obscured by a piece of tape that was on the original record.


 
Image from the new, enhanced 1810 U.S. census collection. The names beneath the tape are now visible.
 

   
Note: In order to bring you the best images and indexes possible, we partnered with FamilySearch.

 


USER COMMENTS


 
XTo the person who can no longer print: This is p...
 
XFantastic work.
 
XWould be nice to be able to read ALL comments.. ...
 
XI have not have trouble reading the census, now ...
 
XTremendous! The effort to do this was needed and...
 
XDefinitely exciting! I hope to find more elusiv...
 
XIs there a way to inform you and have names upda...
 
XPLEASE, when can we see the complete Ohio 1930 c...
 
XI am delighted that you are enhancing the images...
 
Xexcellenent enhancement!
 
XyOU GUYS MAKE HUNTING FUN! 10 hUGS AND A HIGH 5
 
XThank you for all the work you have done for us ...
 
XThanks for the great work.....when will the 1940...
 
XWonderful work! Now find out why only half of t...
 
XThank You, much easier to view and read and find...
 
XExcellent. Thanks so very much.
 
XI have found more links to information thru the ...
 
XSome looks better but it is still hard to find p...
 
XThe alternate names are most helpful, but it wou...
 
XI noticed before I read this article how improve...
 
XVery good and sooooo much more legible. Thank y...
 
XThank you so much. This is so much more readable.
 
XI agree with the others. The enhancements to vi...
 
XThis is a definite improvement and I intend to r...
 
XVast improvement. Looking forward to the other ...
 
XThe new images look worse than the old ones- mor...
 
XWhere's the 1880 "improved" Index? I've quickly...
 
XSeems like some would not be happy if you hung t...
 
XIt seems that the long stroke in Rebecca Homer's...
 
XGreat addition. Keep up the great work
 
XWhat a huge improvement!
 
XThank you Hope to see more work done other records
 
XWow what a difference. This will help improve e...
 
XGreat progress! Thanks for the improvements. Wo...
 
X
 
XThe upgrades seem to be quite helpful. I still w...
 
XBlack and white images are good, but many times ...
 
XThank you! They are looking so much better
 
XThat's great news! 1910 census is the worst for ...
 
XThis is really good news, there were several cen...
 
XIt's a mess and still needs a LOT of work. I...
 
XThis looks wonderful, it was very frustrating to...
 
XThis will be a great help keep up the good work
 
XFabulous! Thank you.
 
XThank you for the article and a thank you VERY M...
 
XGreat! Are there any plans for adding images of...
 
XYou do a great job!
 
XAncestry rocks! Thank you!
 
XSounds great. Please add the 1910 Waltz Twp for...
 
XAn option of having it look like the original or...
 
XIn the above example, I think the name is Rebecc...
 
XWonderful, thank you for improving. Each improv...
 
XThanks for all your hard work it is much appreci...
 
XThanks for making our research more successful.
 
XGreat, now if Ancestry would find all the Vigil ...
 
XDoes a real person read these comments? For yea...
 
XThe updated images of the Census are great. The...
 
XI used to growl each year I renewed my subscript...
 
XFantastic, now how about doing the same thing fo...
 
Xawesome
 
XThank you! I am thrilled that this improvement ...
 
XMany, many thanks for this improvement! This wi...
 
XAdding alternate names is fine; however, in too ...
 
XWonderful!!!!! Now how about doing the Polk Cit...
 
XGreat news. Thank you. Now if only the 1930 ce...
 
XThis is a good thing. I hope when you do this t...
 
XThis may bring forth records that were previousl...
 
XThank you! Ival Shelby Schertz, TX
 
XThank you for all you are doing to make our rese...
 
XSince the more recent census records are more of...
 
XThis is incredible!! It will make research so mu...
 
XThat makes a huge difference -- especially acces...
 
XGood Start! We hope that there will be a wa...
 
Xfantastic!

 

Related Topics