KEEP LEARNING
  •  
  • SEARCH TOPICS

    Advanced Search

Ask the Expert: Sorting Through Search Results

By Tony Macklin 11 August 2009

 

Question: "When I try to search for a name I get thousands of results. How do I sort through them all to find out who my ancestor is?”

 

Answer: At Ancestry.com, we currently have more than 4 billion historical records, which is great because it gives you many chances of finding records of your family. However, it can also mean that you have to do some detective work to narrow down to the right person, particularly if you have a common surname.

 

The best way to start is to enter the full name, ideally with middle name if you know it. Our search engine takes that information and searches through these billions of records to find the right match, and then sorts these into how best they match your queries. This is likely to be a large number, because many names were spelled differently in historical times, or were commonly misspelled by a census taker, and by default Ancestry.com will search for common variations of those names (for example, there are over 800 ways to spell Catherine). The exact matches for the name you put in will appear at the top, and variants will appear below that.

 

If you have too many results, you need to narrow the list down. If you know a date when your ancestor was born, or lived, or died, you can enter this into the search (an easy way to do this is to hit “r” from the results screen, which acts as a “hot key” and brings up the refine box – or some people prefer to click on the refine box on the left hand side of the results). We will then reduce this list to only those records which could have come from within your ancestor’s lifespan—we’ll limit your search results to the years you specify for birth and death, with a fudge factor of five years before and two years after. If you only specify a birth year we’ll search for 100 years after that date; if you only enter a death year we’ll search for 100 years before that date. So, if you enter a birth year of 1901 and a death year of 1929, the search engine will return records between 1896 and 1931. If you put in a death year of 1920, but no birth year, the search engine will return records from between 1815 and 1922. 

 

Next, add in the place where your ancestor lived, which will narrow the search still further. You may still have many results, but the ones that most closely match your information will be nearest the top.

 

You can also narrow your results by using the advanced search feature—just click the “Show Advanced” link in the top, right-hand corner of the search box. This will allow you to select a date range (e.g., 1850 +\- 5 years). You can also select the “exact” box next to a name, date, or location to limit your results to those which match what you entered exactly. Be careful with this feature, however, since—as mentioned—many names and locations were spelled differently in the past, or since a record taker may have misspelled a name, used a nickname, etc. 

 
Click the “Show Advanced” link in the Search box to get more searching options. 


In the advanced search box you can narrow names, dates, and locations to “exact” searches and add date ranges. 


USER COMMENTS


 
XI love Ancestry! There is no way I could find ti...
 
XIf your sorting conventions work the way you sta...
 
XI, too, am very frustrated with the sea of so ca...
 
XWhat I get so frustrated with is putting in my r...
 
XI would like the ability to sort the returned re...
 
XOn the records they do not record the spouse nam...
 
XVery frustrating. When I do an advanced search a...
 
XThe search features are in need of much improvem...
 
XFirst of all, I like Ancestry and find it useful...
 
XI agree with most of those who have commented. ...
 
X
 
XWho knows if anyone will see this! Half the tim...
 
XWhile the tutorial is useful, the searches would...
 
XI feel that the search Ancestry Search Engine ba...
 
XThe new results are totally frustrating. I'd li...
 
XThere are a lot of comments to this nice article...
 
XI think someone is making excuses. There is no ...
 
XWow, not one positive comment have I read. And I...
 
XI, too, am glad I do not have to travel to court...
 
XI agree with the comments. Terrible search engin...
 
XAgree we need a SORT key, preferably on more tha...
 
XI would like to have the "1 of 4000" feature bac...
 
XThere are at times certain levels of frustration...
 
XWould be a great help to have a SORT Key. Some ...
 
XEven following these suggestions, there are stil...
 
XOverall, I think we have to remember that having...
 
XI used to be able to, for example, search for al...
 
XWhat bothers me is that not all of the sources r...
 
XIT WOULD BE GREAT TO HAVE A SORT FEATURE IN TH...
 
XI like to get lots of results. Many times I have...
 
XPersonally I do prefer to get too many hits over...
 
XWow ... I guess that means EVERYONE is unhappy w...
 
XI agree that there needs to be some tweaking don...
 
XNow I realize that I am not the one at fault. I...
 
XAll the other comments express my opinions also....
 
XJust to show how irrelevant the alleged search f...
 
XWhy do I have to look through all the informatio...
 
XBut remember if you put in the name exactly (or ...
 
XI fully agree with all the other comments that t...
 
XIso agree with all the negative comments. The s...
 
XOnly 800 variations for Catherine? Surely ances...
 
Xwhen I list the full name, date and county, I ge...
 
XI agree with all the negative comments posted th...
 
XIt would have been nice if the census takers yea...
 
X800 ways to spell Catherine? That's one list I'...
 
XI agree. It stll pulls in too many mismatches.
 
XI second, third and fourth the user comments -- ...
 
XI agree that we should be able to sort results l...
 
XPlease add me to the mix. The search feature is...
 
XEvery search results I have used with the new fo...
 
XI completey agree with all the other comments an...
 
Xwhat they said
 
XI frequetly find what I'm looking for closer to ...
 
XAs a fairly new user I have been frustrated with...
 
XAll that criteria is great but I still need to b...
 
XIf the results could be sorted again by clicking...
 
XRegarding the comments I just read: Oh, good. It...
 
XI still get garbage frequently. How did I get Ba...
 
XI concur with the last commenter; it does not ap...
 
XI have the same problems of it not giving me inf...
 
XI wish it were this simple. Even when I put in ...

 

Related Topics